Lackawanna County
18 data center projects we know about. 40 towns, boroughs and townships.
Projects
Wildcat Ridge data center campus (Archbald)
Archbald, Lackawanna County
574 acres
π Sept 10, 2026: Council refused to step aside (recusal) and closed the hearing record after 9 hearings.
ProposedProject Gravity (Archbald)
Archbald, Lackawanna County
186 acres Β· for A future hyperscale tenant (not named)
π Sept 22, 2026: Corscale (owner since Dec. 2025) said final land development plans would be submitted soβ¦
ProposedProject Green Mountain (Archbald)
Archbald, Lackawanna County
271 acres
π Sept 30, 2026: Hearings set to resume.
ProposedProject Boson (Archbald)
Archbald, Lackawanna County
86 acres
π Dec 2025: Plan merged into one building of about 620,000 square feet ('Project Boson').
ProposedProject Scott (Archbald I LLC, 18 buildings)
Archbald, Lackawanna County
400 acres
π Sept 18, 2026: The Times-Tribune listed Project Scott as denied by Archbald Council and in court againsβ¦
ProposedProject North (Archbald I LLC, 4 buildings near the Jermyn line)
Archbald, Lackawanna County
66 acres
π Sept 18, 2026: The Times-Tribune listed 'Project North' (4 buildings, 66 acres) as applied under Archbaβ¦
ProposedBreaker Street data center campus (Jessup)
Jessup, Lackawanna County
131 acres
π Sept 25, 2026: News reports said Breaker Street Associates LLC, tied to Catalyst Commercial Developmentβ¦
Approved, not built yetSunnyside Road data center (Jessup)
Jessup, Lackawanna County
π Sept 25, 2026: News reports said the Sunnyside Road project is 'tied up in litigation' after Council's β¦
ProposedDBT-Data Lackawanna One (Jessup)
Jessup, Lackawanna County
39 acres
π Sept 4, 2026: Application filed for a 200,000-square-foot, one-story data center.
Reported in the news, not confirmed yet
Status unclearDBT-Data Lackawanna Two, Three and Four sites (Archbald/Jessup)
Archbald, Lackawanna County
355 acres
π Sept 2026: Reported that DBT holds memorandums with SLIBCO for three more sites.
Reported in the news, not confirmed yet
Approved, not built yetProject Gold (Clifton Township, Gouldsboro)
Clifton Township, Lackawanna County
1,000 acres
π Aug 20, 2026: Judge ruled the township's old data center zoning law void; the settlement stays in effeβ¦
ProposedDickson City Development data center (Bell Mountain)
Dickson City, Lackawanna County
π Sept 18, 2026: The Times-Tribune listed the Bell Mountain project (4 buildings) as denied by the zoningβ¦
ProposedScranton Materials data center campus (Ransom Township)
Ransom Township, Lackawanna County
251 acres
π Sept 3, 2026: News reports said the developer's second lawsuit (asking a judge to rule on the zoning) β¦
Stopped or cancelledMudiita data center campus idea (Ransom Township)
Ransom Township, Lackawanna County
530 acres
π July 27, 2026: Owner said he does not plan a data center there right now; websites advertising an all-eβ¦
ProposedPopca LLC data center campus (Newton Township)
Newton Township, Lackawanna County
76 acres
π Sept 18, 2026: The Times-Tribune listed the Newton project (2 buildings, 76 acres) as denied by the towβ¦
Stopped or cancelledBlakely data center campus
Blakely, Lackawanna County
209 acres
π Sept 12, 2025: Developers withdrew the zoning change request after the borough declined another public β¦
Status unclearTriboro data center site (Olyphant)
Olyphant, Lackawanna County
π April 14, 2026: Borough Council declared its zoning invalid for leaving out data centers, giving itself β¦
Status unclearPNK Group data centers (Valley View Business Park, Archbald)
Archbald, Lackawanna County
89 acres
π July 2026: PNK began a mail and online campaign about two data centers.
Reported in the news, not confirmed yet
Local votes and rules
π Data center rules Β· Ransom Township
Ransom Township supervisors passed a 40-page data center ordinance. Data centers are allowed only as a conditional use in two manufacturing zones, near the Taylor border and along the Susquehanna River, with limits on height, noise and more.
π Other Β· Archbald Borough
Archbald Borough Council finished hearings on the Wildcat Ridge data center campus, which would have 14 large buildings on more than 500 acres. Council refused the developer's request that members step aside for bias. A written decision is due within 45 days of the last hearing.
π Data center rules Β· Ransom Township
Ransom Township scheduled a public hearing on a Data Center Land Use Ordinance. It would allow data centers only as a conditional use in two manufacturing zones, with rules on noise, water, generators, and removal when a data center closes.
π Other Β· Lackawanna County
Lackawanna County commissioners voted unanimously to hire EmPower Analytics Group for $165,000. Over 90 days the firm will study the pollution and health effects of more than a dozen proposed data center campuses and power plants in the county.
βοΈ Court case Β· Clifton Township
A Lackawanna County judge voided Clifton Township's data center zoning after challenges from the Project Gold developer. The township is now working on new data center rules.
π Data center rules Β· Clifton Township
After the court ruling, Clifton Township is drafting new data center rules. The draft includes a 100-foot buffer, a limit that kicks in for heavy water use, and a plan for removing buildings when a data center closes. Residents asked for bigger buffers and a 35-foot height limit.
β Turned down Β· Dickson City Borough
Dickson City's Zoning Hearing Board unanimously rejected a developer's challenge to the borough's data center rules. The developer argued the manufacturing zone lacks power lines and space. The fight now moves to county court.
β Turned down Β· Archbald Borough
Archbald Borough Council voted down a plan by Texas-based Provident Realty Advisors (Archbald 1 LLC) for a data center complex with 18 computer buildings. About 200 residents came to the special meeting to oppose it.
π Other Β· Archbald Borough
After months of complaints about how data center plans were handled, Archbald Borough Council removed its president, vice president, and president pro tem from those leadership roles. A new council president was chosen.
βοΈ Court case Β· Dickson City Borough
The developer Dickson City Development LLC asked the county court to cancel Dickson City's new data center zoning law. The company calls the rules exclusionary because they block its Bell Mountain project.
π Data center rules Β· Dickson City Borough
Dickson City Borough Council voted unanimously to allow data centers only in its light manufacturing (M1) zone, and only with a special exception from the zoning board. Data centers are not allowed in homes or open-space zones. This came after a developer proposed a big campus on Bell Mountain.
βοΈ Court case Β· Ransom Township
Scranton Materials appealed Ransom Township's rejection to county court. The company argues the township's zoning illegally leaves no place for data centers.
β Turned down Β· Ransom Township
Ransom Township supervisors voted 2-1 to reject a request to change zoning for a six-building data center at a 251-acre quarry on Newton Road. They said the developer, Scranton Materials, did not give enough testimony or evidence.
π€ Agreement with the company Β· Clifton Township
Clifton Township supervisors unanimously approved a legal settlement with the Project Gold developer. It allows five two-story data center buildings on three sites along Route 380. More than 100 residents came to oppose it, and some promised to sue.
βοΈ Court case Β· Archbald Borough
Eight Archbald residents asked the county court to throw out the borough's new data center zoning law. They say the borough skipped required steps like proper notice and planning review. They also say the law lets data centers go in more places and be taller and louder.
β Turned down Β· Jessup Borough
Jessup's Zoning Hearing Board unanimously turned down zoning relief for six data centers planned on Breaker Street. The board said the needed power substation would sit in a residential zone, which is not allowed. The developer can appeal in county court.
βοΈ Court case Β· Clifton Township
The Project Gold developer, 1778 Rich Pike LLC, appealed the zoning board's ruling to county court. It argued the township's rules really did block data centers. In August 2026 a county judge voided the township's data center zoning.
π Data center rules Β· Archbald Borough
Archbald Borough Council voted 4-2, with one member not voting, to add data center rules to its zoning law. The rules create data center overlay zones in four areas of the borough. Many residents spoke against it, and an earlier try in October failed.
π Other Β· Clifton Township
Clifton Township's zoning board unanimously ruled that the township's data center rules were legal and did not unfairly shut out data centers. This rejected a challenge from the Project Gold developer.
π Other Β· Archbald Borough
Archbald Borough Council met to vote on new data center zoning rules, but the plan died because no one seconded the motion. Residents saw this as a win. Council later passed the rules in November 2025.
β Turned down Β· Clifton Township
Clifton Township supervisors voted 2-1 against a legal settlement with the developer of Project Gold, a planned campus of about 30 data center buildings. The deal would have allowed two data center buildings in residential areas.
π Data center rules Β· Jessup Borough
Jessup Borough Council voted unanimously to tighten its data center rules. Data centers can only go on industrial land south of the Casey Highway and need a public hearing first. The rules also limit height and require noise studies and water-saving cooling.
π Data center rules Β· Covington Township
Covington Township supervisors approved a zoning change that allows data centers in the rural township. A developer plans a campus of 25 to 30 buildings on about 500 acres along Interstate 380 in Covington and Clifton townships. Many residents opposed it.
π Data center rules Β· Clifton Township
Clifton Township supervisors adopted data center zoning rules after a developer claimed the township's zoning left no room for data centers. The developer said the new rules were too strict. A county judge voided the township's data center zoning in August 2026.
Find your town
In Pennsylvania, your township, borough or city usually decides where data centers can go.
- Archbald Borough
- Benton Township
- Blakely Borough
- Carbondale City
- Carbondale Township
- Clarks Green Borough
- Clarks Summit Borough
- Clifton Township
- Covington Township
- Dalton Borough
- Dickson City Borough
- Dunmore Borough
- Elmhurst Township
- Fell Township
- Glenburn Township
- Greenfield Township
- Jefferson Township
- Jermyn Borough
- Jessup Borough
- La Plume Township
- Madison Township
- Mayfield Borough
- Moosic Borough
- Moscow Borough
- Newton Township
- North Abington Township
- Old Forge Borough
- Olyphant Borough
- Ransom Township
- Roaring Brook Township
- Scott Township
- Scranton City
- South Abington Township
- Spring Brook Township
- Taylor Borough
- Thornhurst Township
- Throop Borough
- Vandling Borough
- Waverly Township
- West Abington Township